The insistence of the question by the Italian Government on the law on the PACS (or say, as with naive concern these have been renamed) is equal only to futility and uselessness of the problem in light of the economic and social situation in which to pay our country. As rightly pointed out by the President of the UDC Cesa, in addition to the League's Maroni, the question simply does not exist. Much better would be to deal with this strange government support to be given to the family institution rather than torment you with the elevation out of place other less restrictive forms of cohabitation. Or worse, with the recognition of same-sex couples, as desired by the most extreme (but no less "heavy") within the governing coalition. We can not, as moderate, not worried about the arrogance of those who tell us a little electoral advantage as well as challenged with facts prompt the question that has been illegally obtained (1), would "bypass" the common feeling of the majority of Italians, compact in saying no to same-sex unions. To those who accuse the Italian company to be in a period of economic decline and registry, linking also to these cultural decadence, we reply that, if anything, these problems are, and for the most part, the result of moral decay in which the domain of the self-proclaimed cultural elite left, with their continuous tam-tam media, have infected the Italian company. That making is instead a moral rebirth due to the fact that the Church abandoned the passive role for so long has characterized, decided to intervene in the debate on ethically sensitive issues, as is his right as an institution and cultural reality of primary importance in Italian society. Grillini can not see how having the right to defend ideas now in the minority both in politics and in society, and authority can not, as Benedict XVI, of a different cultural value and consentitecelo, of a different weight on the level of purely numerical representation (2), express their views. Moreover, the statements by the Pope and the prelates are not signs purely political but rather on the ethical recommendations that the voter as the politician they are free to follow or not. Needless to insist on the risk of degeneration in the sense that the welfare approach opens the way an extension of the rights granted to married couples regularly. In a country sadly capable of imaginative developments well beyond the legal limit when it comes to derive economic benefit from the rights covered by public donations, we leave to the reader the pleasure of imagining what a circus assist with sixteen year olds who would get very easily from parents permission to contract a civil partnership with an elderly or relative in order to get the survivor's pension. Maybe in return assistance. A hand laverebbe laverebbero the other and both face, in perfect "I would like family" soon become "I would say." It is there that the Italian cinema of today feel the lack of a Toto or Alberto Sordi ... The situation takes a turn even more puzzling when you consider the cultural battle led by the transverse component of the homosexual left-wing parties in favor of the equalization of gay couples in heterosexual ones. Much better would be for the Italian Government, pace extremist Grillini, take care of solving the economic and cultural issues (3) that afflict the family institution in our country, in order to help those who assume duties before still claim rights to plan their future with confidence. This will most likely solve the problem of low birth rate, which certainly would not the legalization of marriages between homosexuals. So respect for the individual but for all, without hypocrisy, privileges for this institution and the social formation at the base of human life, both real engines of development of any civilized society: the natural family and marriage.
(1) See the book "Urns betrayed" by Victor Felts and Renato Brunetta. (2) That does not mean absolutely electoral force, and that this should not be confused, at least in the case of the Church. (3) There is no doubt that the aging of society, due to declining birth, it is a problem not only economic but mostly cultural, albeit linked to the way the family economy seen as purchasing power affects the lives and welfare of members of the family. It is obvious that the moral decadence to which today we see many companies now oppose membership and non-Catholic or not, led to focus on the material side of life at the expense of the ethical and spiritual. In short: better one son, a good wardrobe and a nice car, two or three and having to make do ...
(1) See the book "Urns betrayed" by Victor Felts and Renato Brunetta. (2) That does not mean absolutely electoral force, and that this should not be confused, at least in the case of the Church. (3) There is no doubt that the aging of society, due to declining birth, it is a problem not only economic but mostly cultural, albeit linked to the way the family economy seen as purchasing power affects the lives and welfare of members of the family. It is obvious that the moral decadence to which today we see many companies now oppose membership and non-Catholic or not, led to focus on the material side of life at the expense of the ethical and spiritual. In short: better one son, a good wardrobe and a nice car, two or three and having to make do ...
Author: Umberto Ceratti 
