Tuesday, December 4, 2007

In Remembrance Plaque Wording

The new creature Berlusconi: fake news, fad or real change?

without transforming the party into the new "thing" is just a remake of the Knight Forza Italy

At a time when there is a lot about the birth of new political formations, yet almost all generically called "thing", all of which combined with a different color which should reflect historical and ideological roots and values \u200b\u200bdrive very far apart on paper, much less in daily practice, do not be surprise announcement of unilateralism the birth of the new "thing" of the center. "What d'Azur", for convenience of definition, whose removal from the hat of the inexhaustible Knight should not, as some insist on doing surprisingly taking too seriously the release of our be simplistically reduced to the same desire to have your hands free from the ties that the Allies expected the string to the wrists at the time was about to change once and for all the rules of the system that runs our poor Italy. And already, some might say, because this system Berlusconi Italy and this was very, very little ... I am also frankly ridiculous interpretations of the weekly tabloid of the already legendary climb on the running board of the car in that of Milan, in front of a cheering crowd, in response to allegations by former pupil alleged Fini masterminding a plot against her at the end of defamatory media. Why then would be discovered. Now, as in the corridors of power and sex troubles that often derive from it have always been at home, this is to be seen as an overly simplistic explanation of what happened. And, most importantly, it honors the political genius of Berlusconi. Absolutely unrelated to the remaining evergreen environment seekers plots and the equally thriving anti-Berlusconi ruling, the reader is to be proposed as another sindacabilissima simple view of things. Others would not, Berlusconi, if not better capitalize on, and once and for all, the enormous power that gives being to once one of the richest men in the world, the Italian patron information and an unsurpassed capopopolo, but especially the media, in accordance with the timing of which is the symbol and interpreter superfine. In practice to reduce the capricious to replicas of the puppets also with regard to the future base of the movement, the (dis) organization of internal force Italy, everything is not a party, thus eliminating the root entries already dying out choir, and avoiding the risk of the birth of internal factions. I think it is worth remembering, however, that a (real) is a genetically democratic party in which they are born is normal patterns as expressions of sensitivity and different backgrounds, though in the end all be traced back to a similar idea of \u200b\u200bsociety and state. This, in hindsight, it does not happen in Forza Italy, unless you want to believe that the intelligent as isolated Adornato can only be a force to be able to tell her in front of the overwhelming power of management. Current and then as an example of democracy and freedom of political expression, once you have paid the price of a live conflict acceptable result of the debate inside the party. Just the price does not seem that Our wish to pay, in the absurd and sometimes irritating belief that a party and a corporation be treated as an undertaking in which the head that the guidelines and others can not do nothing but obey. Trivial? Simplistic interpretation as almost tabloid in the first place? No, simple, which is quite different. Simple and disturbing that in large characters qesto plans more or less unwarranted appropriation of power often go hand in hand. The complexity makes it more likely strategic errors, and Berlusconi is too intelligent not to know. Just think of the obvious references to the unity of its center: drive but as the ideas of the strongest approval, to be reborn as a succubus disoggettivarsi ideas of who owns the majority of the votes. This is not democracy, is an embryo of creeping dictatorship and unacceptable ideological and culture. And to tell the truth, the danger is not only represented by Berlusconi. The great desire of reductio ad unum of varied internal reality to the two poles and attempts to act in combination are justified as arising from the proliferation of political parties and costs paid by the city. So why not address the waste data from a large number of parties with more control over their finances and a reduction of the often absurd and exaggerated privileges enjoyed by the political class? Democracy is not sacrificed on the altar of economic efficiency that Italy will pull out of a chasm that first it is essentially moral and cultural. It is then proportional to, with a simultaneous return to the preference because it is once again the people and not parties to determine the elect. Paradoxically, they are much less dangerous to democracy, the hordes of owner-operators of votes that surely would know well take advantage of the reintroduction of preference rather than a handful of professional politicians that lead to early, already in the preparation of electoral rolls as happened in the past policies, the vast majority of those who will be asked to compose the Parliament. In the first case it is always possible to ensure the freedom of choice by saying no to those who seek to establish a relationship of patronage with us. In the second one is the possibility of choice fails.
curiosity is Berlusconi now has the chance to really prove to be "popular" disproving considerations such as those expressed in these lines and turning his new creature in something other than a Force in Italy extended dry branches of other parties, helping the birth of a real democratic comparison internal and, eventually giving way to a new season. That too of the now long-awaited return to real politics.