We start from a premise: it is difficult to get into someone's head if a wrong idea that someone has a strong cultural background, is well informed and then before you get an idea in relation to a fact or an event to reflect a little about it, considering the various arguments for and against a given thesis. If the someone to convince is exhausted by a television with no content other than breasts and thighs, accompanied by childish ideas and behaviors, or overlapped by screams of those who would impose their truth by force of lungs, if briefly, the listener is as intelligent and confused by dementia squalor now prevailing on the small screen, then seemingly solid arguments to convince him of the goodness of those who are its arguments, it becomes a breeze. Simply find a sensational documentary, not packaged with carelessness (maybe it was just that ...) but even blind partisanship and extreme ideologization, filled with errors easily verifiable by the average man, knowing hand relying on preconceived ideas who sees the establishment of a victim of a reality documentary dark and evil, and that's it. The buzz starts, the behemoth formed by the steamroller chatting deaf to all reasoning is typical of our time begins to beat a force destroying everything slogan encounters on its path. Now, we run the risk of airing the infamous BBC documentary "Sex Crimes and the Vatican" is just that: to make ill-informed, intended to raise the level of the current conflict in our society, at a time in which to this is not really needed. The falsity of the thesis propounded by the author of the documentary there is no doubt anyone who has taken go to the trouble to read the documents cited therein, will have noticed the rub: It is absolutely true that the silence is recommended to those who learns of acts committed by clergy pedophiles, or that the hierarchies are held in the punishment of priests pedophiles. Quite the contrary. Pope Benedict XVI has raised the statute of limitations of the crime of pedophilia, recommended extreme harshness and severity to the point, Introvigne docet, to be criticized for not being sufficiently guaranteed.
What is hidden, then, behind the documentary, the TV network that produced it and the RAI, which wants to send it tonight in prime time? Just a history of ideology and atavistic hatred by those who, whether parties or lobby politicians, see the Church as an enemy to defeat, perhaps the only remaining bulwark to defend the company by secularization and the collapse into the bottomless maelstrom of scientism. Not for nothing the transmission Annozero, certainly not known for its balance and the rejection of partisanship and take part in the mathematician Piergiorgio Odifreddi, an atheist who does not just want to be, but that ridding the world of religions handing in the hands of science, arguing that the latter, unlike those, he never hurt humanity ... Evidently the good Odifreddi believes that the atomic bomb was invented and built in some secret room of the Vatican, or perhaps by some rabbi, instead that a group of scientists of various nationalities. URIOS that do not take it but never with the Muslims ... be afraid?
Odifreddi however, is only a puppet in the "Big Game" in place. Forces far more formidable stir quite above the common perception; directing atomic virtual weapon dishonest and biased information, to the great enemy, the Catholic Church and its hierarchy, guilty of spreading a vision of human life not subject economism and materialism of communism that is typical of extreme capitalism, but based on the priceless value of human dignity, the only limit to the commodification of Man. So here is powerful lobbies that joined battle with putting in all their force to overthrow that enemy. Those same forces in Italy, still foaming with rage in front of the mammoth success of Family Day, they agreed the best reaction to this demonstration of people, an attack no matter how biased, dishonest and based on lies, as long as derogatory. A direct attack to undermine or at least weaken the convictions of those young couples, old lady, works of Christian charity, located in the Church and in the galaxy of reality that surround the only refuge in a world that has now made the lust for sex , money and power are his main beliefs.
This is the reality behind the fog of media that makes similar, almost indistinguishable, in the eyes of the dog and the wolf. With great relief of the wolf, of course.
We do not just have to raise our feeble voice in defense of someone who, despite often serious mistakes in history has always stood as an operator of civilization, progress and liberation from materialism and from animality Human Understanding as a negative, indicating a path to maximum realization of his dignity. Today this road, if crossed, would be an impediment to those who want to relegate the only man to make him understand the biological reality and life as a race only to satisfy their own desires without regard for the limits that the dignity and therefore the placed at his moral behavior, and those who would rather see a man reduced to the plight of consumer gear made only "disposable" by the great global economic mechanism (1).
The third way, that human dignity is not the only practicable by those who, after reaching a new state of consciousness about the reality around him, decided not to be a slave and tool of anyone, except those who, for those who believe, has created the world. Even non-believers, however, can be found in the system of values \u200b\u200bthat the Church proposes an escape from the sadness of endless materialism.
Who has not yet realized that this war is in its own game future as a person really free and custodian of a dignity not scientifically measured, but no less real and less important, we propose, as Neo in the famous "Matrix", the choice between the two pills. The red and blue. Of course, taking the second will continue to live as best pulling without worrying about anything except the satisfaction of its primary and immediate needs. It is a form of being less "full", but also less demanding and much more carefree, giving other users the choice of what will or will not be your destiny. Much easier, for sure.
Choose the red pill instead will worry, pain, anger, because entail a commitment, involvement, sharing, and then alternating wins and losses in the defense of a conception of life that is based on a system of essential values. However, it will really life, and realize its maximum value of free men and women, and conscious.
Ultimately, this chapter consists of the broadcast by Santoro and his band of documentary / farce is merely another battle in the war against human dignity and its defenders. The call is to check to realize on their own dell'insostenibilità the thesis that there Annozero propinerà through video unworthy.
not remain silent. Dimostriamogli that, despite the fog, we know who is the wolf ...
(1) The site requires brevity, but it is clear that far from any generalization. There is no doubt that capitalism and a benign left for values. Which is not to Di Pietro, of course ...
Author: Umberto Ceratti 
