I write these lines a few minutes after the defeat of the Prodi government in the Senate, following the vote on the motion on the Union's foreign policy. This, after a high level of political discourse by D'Alema, of the reformist mature and aware of the value of the image of the nation in the international arena, discourse in which the foreign minister said that if the government had been defeated would have to take note of the inexistence of a majority and therefore, grossly speaking, to go home.
Well, as I said at the beginning, the government was defeated. From what will follow this resounding defeat for the current parliamentary majority, parliamentary and stress, because I highly doubt that if you voted right now would also be elections, we understand that Italy is deeply routed in the way of modernization in terms of and comparison of the dynamics of "self" of the political class that do finally enter the ranks of countries qualify under this particular point of view, as civilians. Because civilians ruled by a political class for whom the word, the commitments made by the respect and dignity that follows these are the most important asset, and to keep jealously to defend against any temptation to selfishly driven by low interest.
The opportunity that arises before the foreign minister, from the point of view of his political career, even historic. D'Alema has the opportunity to inaugurate, with behavior that take place in the coming hours, a new season of Italian politics: a season in which the political class can finally move closer to the real country with dignity and pride of knowing that consistent and worthy of trust afforded by people, ending the current widespread contempt against it. In our age of media noise, the meaningless chatter, from statements of principle regularly contradicted by the behavior in their personal and political agenda, a measure of consistency in their own words to give D'Alema a dignity and a determination that may not be his recognition by even the most ardent opponents.
These words are not interested in those who hope to see a fall in the dust for which political party did not vote and whose thinking does not share the ideological foundations and values. No, these words represent the hope of those who, in having to accept the debate and political confrontation, would like to see their country rise morally and those who govern and govern the stand as a shining example to the people.
If this remains only a hope we'll know in the next few hours.
Well, as I said at the beginning, the government was defeated. From what will follow this resounding defeat for the current parliamentary majority, parliamentary and stress, because I highly doubt that if you voted right now would also be elections, we understand that Italy is deeply routed in the way of modernization in terms of and comparison of the dynamics of "self" of the political class that do finally enter the ranks of countries qualify under this particular point of view, as civilians. Because civilians ruled by a political class for whom the word, the commitments made by the respect and dignity that follows these are the most important asset, and to keep jealously to defend against any temptation to selfishly driven by low interest.
The opportunity that arises before the foreign minister, from the point of view of his political career, even historic. D'Alema has the opportunity to inaugurate, with behavior that take place in the coming hours, a new season of Italian politics: a season in which the political class can finally move closer to the real country with dignity and pride of knowing that consistent and worthy of trust afforded by people, ending the current widespread contempt against it. In our age of media noise, the meaningless chatter, from statements of principle regularly contradicted by the behavior in their personal and political agenda, a measure of consistency in their own words to give D'Alema a dignity and a determination that may not be his recognition by even the most ardent opponents.
These words are not interested in those who hope to see a fall in the dust for which political party did not vote and whose thinking does not share the ideological foundations and values. No, these words represent the hope of those who, in having to accept the debate and political confrontation, would like to see their country rise morally and those who govern and govern the stand as a shining example to the people.
If this remains only a hope we'll know in the next few hours.
0 comments:
Post a Comment